MANCHESTER, NH—As election season heats up, Hillsborough County Attorney John Coughlin’s record is drawing considerable attention from voters and critics alike. Since his election in 2020, Coughlin has undertaken significant reforms to address longstanding issues within the County Attorney’s Office, including backlog reductions, budget stabilization, and bolstered partnerships with local law enforcement and courts.
When Coughlin took office, the County Attorney’s Office faced an array of challenges: critical case backlogs involving serious crimes, administrative disorganization, and a shortage of essential resources. Under his leadership, Coughlin implemented rigorous procedural changes, including advanced scheduling systems and integrated paralegal support within trial teams, which have led to streamlined case processing and enhanced efficiency in prosecuting serious offenses.
One case drawing controversy is that of Amuri Diole, which highlights a fundamental contrast in the approach between Coughlin and his challenger, public defender Kim Kossick. Coughlin’s campaign website underscores his stance on prioritizing victims and maintaining community safety, while raising questions about Kossick’s focus on defending individuals involved in violent crimes, including Diole, who was accused of a brutal assault in Valley Cemetery. Kossick has filed for sanctions, claiming the website could affect the defendant’s due process rights.
In response, Coughlin defends the website as a means of underscoring key differences in how each candidate views the role of the County Attorney. “The issue is whether my opponent has the judgment required to serve as Hillsborough County Attorney—whether she can prioritize the rights of victims, their families, and the safety of the community,” Coughlin stated.
While the election continues, Coughlin’s record stands as a testament to his focus on procedural rigor and his commitment to transforming the office into a more effective and accountable entity, ensuring that justice serves both the victims and the broader community. As voters consider their options, they will need to weigh these contrasting visions for Hillsborough County’s approach to justice.
